Aug
31

NFL has to bench Vick now
By Terry Frei
Denver Post Columnist
Article Last Updated: 07/19/2007 10:06:43 AM MDT

About Michael Vick …

Suspend the jerk.

I tend to be a contrarian, and I tried not to join the bandwagon on this one. Among many other things, I was going to ask: Didn’t the Duke lacrosse mess remind us that charges in a grand jury indictment aren’t automatically true? In a market in which many of us justifiably excoriate Barry Bonds as a disgrace, yet many fans and (even more disgracefully) newspaper writers still portray Bill Romanowski as a charming rogue, can’t we at least wonder about our adjustable standards?

Those still are points to ponder. But the disturbing information in the federal grand jury indictment against the Atlanta Falcons quarterback and three others is overwhelming. Vick is

Blogs
Visit Terry Frei’s new blog on All Things Colorado Sports.
Visit All Things Avs to which Frei contributes.
convincingly linked to the horrific dogfighting operation on his property in rural Virginia, mocking his Who, me? claims of innocence.
This is not a dishonorable district attorney taking advantage of a malleable local grand jury. It stems from a careful federal proceeding, and the paucity of leaks was such that there were erroneous reports in recent days that Vick wouldn’t be indicted.

Under the NFL’s heightened off-field conduct standards, commissioner Roger Goodell has been willing to judge in advance of the frequently glacial legal system, and that’s another justification for him suspending Vick. He’s done it before, and everyone understands that it’s now as much a part of the NFL system as instant replay.

Yes, I believe the worst. Vick is a scumbag. The Falcons even would be well-advised to suspend him before Goodell has to step in.

On Wednesday, I called my brother, David, in New York to get his perspective. Why? He followed our father into the NFL, working as a public-relations executive with both the Broncos and the 49ers before moving into his own PR agency and the restaurant business. He also is the longtime television analyst on the Westminster Kennel Club and National dog shows, and he now is the full-time director of communications for the WKC. He and his wife, Cheri, walk their Brittany spaniels on the Upper East Side and are involved in programs utilizing dogs in hospital therapy work.

Michael Vick and people like him in all of this - and I guess we need to say ‘allegedly’ - are supposed to be great warriors, Dave said. They should understand that having a dog fighting to the death is not what a warrior is all about, especially if they’re the ones making it happen. The reality is people look up to these guys.

We’re going to hear that it’s the ‘culture’ and those kinds of things. Well, it’s not a ‘culture’ to have a loyal, brave and courageous animal fight to the death so we can be entertained or gamble on it. That’s not what entertainment, that’s not what being a warrior is all about. It’s sickening.

What about all these kids out there in those number 7 jerseys? You’re going to tell them that it’s OK? It’s a proven fact that someone who’s involved in animal abuse as a youngster, as they get older they’re more prone to be involved in domestic abuse - or worse. They don’t have any regard for living things. Those people who are involved are all cowards.

In 2006, the WKC’s best in show winner was a colored bull terrier, Rufus. The unfortunate offshoot of misuse and irresponsible breeding of bull terriers is that the pit bull label often is indiscriminately applied, even in local laws that ban specific breeds - as Denver does. Fact is, while the United Kennel Club registers an American pit bull terrier, it’s more of a contrived term than it is a specific breed, and the more predominant American Kennel Club doesn’t follow suit. Pit bulls - the dogs used in fighting, or simply as an alleged confirmation of an owner’s toughness - are mixed breeds, most often starting with a Staffordshire bull terrier as a base.

There are some cities in this country where Rufus can’t go, Dave said. But I’ve been all kinds of places with this dog and he loves everybody.

Yet the bull terrier and the offshoots, Dave said, at first were bred to be protectors. But because they’re loyal and courageous and tough, if they fall into the wrong hands, people can redirect those personality traits and that temperament to be aggressive. It’s too bad, because they can be the most loving, happy pets. But we’re walking down the street in New York, and there are too many of them. People have them who shouldn’t have them. If you need a macho dog to show you’re macho, you’re not.

Some of these guys seem to think they can get a dog like that and put a bunch of chains on it and walk down the street with it on a 10-foot leash, wreaking havoc, that’s some recognition that they’re tough guys.

Suspending Vick in advance of the legal system’s verdict might do little to chip away at that mentality, but it’s the right thing for the NFL to do.

Staff writer Terry Frei can be reached at 303-954-1895 or tfrei@denverpost.com.

Comments

ganaa on 2 September, 2009 at 5:12 pm #

no, but it might be important for you…


Steven on 3 September, 2009 at 7:22 pm #

Vick is a thug who can play football.He made all that fame and fortune but didn’t find new hobbies or friends and now it’s gonna bite him in the A.S.S


Marsha B on 5 September, 2009 at 5:16 pm #

Thanks for the post. I am interested in any material that is dedicated to ridding the NFL of the monster, Michael Vick


Wmchampionx2 on 7 September, 2009 at 5:33 am #

Michael Vick is a thug playing football? I think thats taking it a little too far. It is well exploited that Vick didn’t have the greatest living arrangement for himself when he was a teenager. And too get out of that situation Vick has worked harder then any of us here on the computer complaining that he is a thug who was just given talent and he has wasted it. Nothing can be farther from the truth. You must first realize that he is just accused of committing a crime and has had no criminal charges against him. Second to come on here and bash somebody saying they are just a thug when they have put there ass on the line everyday they stepped out on the field not knowing if he is going to have a career after the game is ridiculous. You go to your little cubicle and write on a computer and not much risk of tearing an ACL there, but Vick goes out and does amazing things not only for his team for a whole city/state and all you can do is come on her and bash his lifestyle? He has chosen a lifestyle to live and nobody should be defyning the kind of person he is just because of the lifestyle he lives. Man i thought we were over prejudice in sports. But i guess we still have a long way too go


LSUballs on 9 September, 2009 at 12:20 am #

I sorry I fell asleep whilst reading your question.


H.O.T. Dog on 10 September, 2009 at 7:16 am #

Thanks I will forward this to my son= he has interest in this type of sports - I am involved in the dog world and sewing catering… sorry hon

Hot Dog


trianglears on 13 September, 2009 at 3:56 am #

I’m shocked that anyone would say that the above comments have prejudicial overtones.

The fact of the matter is that the 18 page detailed indictment includes a MOUNTAIN of evidence that will be extremely difficult for Vick - or any of the other defendants - to dispute.

It was quite clear to me from the beginning that Michael Vick HAD TO KNOW what was going on at his property - you don’t have an extensive kennel that includes 50+ automobile axels embedded in cement in order to strategically tether 50+ dogs 24/7 for kicks - this was a serious business and more than indicative of a dog fighting enterprise.

There are many people who have grown up in situations that are less than ideal, who have made something of themselves and who never had to resort to engaging in dog fighting to prove…to prove what? This, in fact, is the elephant in the room: why would any ethical and moral individual become involved in dog fighting?

The fact of the matter is that we’re the humans - we’re the ones who are supposed to know better and regardless of where anyone grew up, to intentionally inflict pain, suffering, cruelty and abuse on a helpless animal for the purpose of amusement and profit is cowardly and despicable.

There’s a reason that Congress recently passed the Animal Fighting Prohibition Act and made dog fighting a felony: aside from the cruelty involved, blood sports are known to draw other unsavory and criminal activities such as the sale of illegal drugs and weapons.

Let’s not forget that most domestic abusers, and even serial killers, had abused and/or killed helpless animals at some earlier time in their lives before progressing to humans.

Even were Vick to only have KNOWN what was going on at his property - and there’s no way he didn’t - and not participated, that he failed to report this type of illegal activity is quite telling of his conscience, morals, values and ethics.

What does it tell us?

That he has none.


Post a Comment
Name:
Email:
Website:
Comments: